Texts

An interview with Alfredo RR de Sousa

GRA : Western media confidently say that the fall of the current Syrian regime is inevitable. In your opinion, how well founded this prediction is, and is there some political power that can bring order to this situation?

A.R.R.S: The western media, clearly on mercenary basis regarding atlantist and zionist’s matters, has no intention on revealing precisely the facts occurring in Syria. Instead of what these media jerks pathetically intent to endorse as true, Bashar al Assad’s government holds tactical and strategic precedence at military angle, and has defeated the rebels in Aleppo and restored control  over Damascus. Despite north-american and their european satellites, alongside the zionist entity, desire to control the situation, the final victory of the legitimate government of the Syrian Arab Republic is only a matter of time.

GRA: How likely is a forceful U.S. intervention in the Syrian conflict and attempt to violently overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad (or the U.S. will keep a distance and will not dare to risk)? Under circumstances of such a possibility, what consequences it will bring to America itself?

A.R.R.S: I do not suppose EUA has conditions to any kind of direct intervention at the present context. That  would be a political and military adventure of unpredictable consequences, owing to a military attack against Syria is, at the same time, envolving libanese Hizbollah’s militias such as the Islamic Republic of Iran’s armed force and of the zionist entity. It is, as anyone can ascertain, the threshold for a war of vast proportions, able to submerge the EUA, and even the Western as a whole, in a deep swamp enough to make Vietnan looks like a picnic. 

GRA: How do you assess Russia's position in this issue? Is Russia able to compromise, yielding to the wiles of the West (for example, the proposal of Hillary Clinton to establish demilitarized zone), despite the fact, that Russia has already received a very difficult experience in the situation in Libya?

A.R.R.S: I entirely trust on the strong disposition exhibited so far by president Putin for the no acceptance of any form of military intervention at the syrian conflict.The ba’athist’s Syria has always been a staunch Moscow’s ally,  under Hafez al Assad as well as today at his son Bashar, keeping on Tartur, as we all know, the only naval base on Mediterrian of the Russian War Navy. Therefore, allow Syria to be converted into an EUA and its allies’ satelite-State would be a catastrophic event for the great slavic nation‘s geopolitical affairs, which will oppose itself to this maneuver at all costs. Furthermore, the Islamic Republic of Iran, in consonance with the russian’s position, is also in terms to obliterate western’s indemnities in the area.

 
Tags: 

An interview with Flávio Gonçalves

 

GRA : Western media confidently say that the fall of the current Syrian regime is inevitable. In your opinion, how well founded this prediction is, and is there some political power that can bring order to this situation?

F. G. : As far as we can see it’s a false prediction, given Assad’s forces are winning on the field (thanks to China and Russia pressuring the UN’s Security Council not to intervene, remember Gadhafi’s forces were also winning until the westerners bombed their positions), but the media will insist on it to convince both our politicians and voters until everyone believes a change of regime is the only solution for Syria. If we can’t trust the UN to bring order, what other political power exists?

GRA : How likely is a forceful U.S. intervention in the Syrian conflict and attempt to violently overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad (or the U.S. will keep a distance and will not dare to risk)? Under circumstances of such a possibility, what consequences it will bring to America itself?

F. G.: That depends on who wins this year’s elections, Romney (a Mormon, a Christian sect far more radical than most Muslim fundamentalists) or Obama. Obama will not risk it outside the UN, just like in Libya (remember Sarkozy had to thrown the first punch).

GRA : How do you assess Russia's position in this issue? Is Russia able to compromise, yielding to the wiles of the West (for example, the proposal of Hillary Clinton to establish demilitarized zone), despite the fact, that Russia has already received a very difficult experience in the situation in Libya?

F.G. : After the experience with Libya, I have to be honest my opinion regarding Russia, Venezuela and Iran was a bit shaken, personally I believe they were all to coward to act. Will they compromise now or risk a world war? I’m not seeing any of them, not even Iran right next door, risking a world war, and they can make up all the excuses they want, I will still behold it (and I’m sure the same goes for the USA strategists) as an act of cowardice if they fail to send in troops to defend Syria.

An interview with Vincenzo Maddaloni

 

GRA : Western media confidently say that the fall of the current Syrian regime is inevitable. In your opinion, how well founded this prediction is, and is there some political power that can bring order to this situation?

V.M. : At the moment there are no shortcuts International to stop the civil war. A no-fly zone is impractical in the skies of Syria. Because unlike Libya, the Syrian air force is true that before being annihilated can do much damage. And because Syria is defended by anti-aircraft missile system among the most modern, ceded by Russia, that the Israelis treat you with respect. In these circumstances I do not believe in a fall of the Syrian regime.

GRA : How likely is a forceful U.S. intervention in the Syrian conflict and attempt to violently overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad (or the U.S. will keep a distance and will not dare to risk)? Under circumstances of such a possibility, what consequences it will bring to America itself?

V.M. : The latest confirmation comes from the “New York Times” a few days ago, when he writes that Obama "is increasing aid to the rebels and redoubling efforts (literally, ed) to build a coalition of countries agree to cut forcefully government of President Bashar al-Assad. " So if "is increasing" means that the aid to the rebels already there. Namely, that the United States was already in violation of the UN Charter and attempted to subvert outside a sovereign country. Now he says "double their efforts". That is more than a year the U.S. is waging a war by proxy against Syria and the ineffable “New York Times” (with the retinue of West newspapers and TV news) there pretends that what has happened so far was for a "diplomatic Regulation ".

GRA : How do you assess Russia's position in this issue? Is Russia able to compromise, yielding to the wiles of the West (for example, the proposal of Hillary Clinton to establish demilitarized zone), despite the fact, that Russia has already received a very difficult experience in the situation in Libya?

V.M. :  Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State, continues to accuse Russia of selling military helicopters to the regime of Bashar al-Assad, a charge denied by Moscow, who spoke of easy maintenance and updating of helicopters provided several years ago. But in addition to the allegations Hillary Clinton also addressed pressing invitations to Russia to cooperate in the creation of a demilitarized zone. We can only hope that Russia will not agree to take part in these "diplomatic initiatives". Washington wants to have their cake and eat it too. Break down and kill (yes, kill) Bashar, and have a nice friendly regime in Syria. And he wants everyone to be in agreement with the plan including Russia and China. Even if, collapsed Bashar thugs come to power, as happened in Libya

An interview with Marco Costa

 

GRA: Western media confidently say that the fall of the current Syrian regime is inevitable. In your opinion, how well founded this prediction is, and is there some political power that can bring order to this situation?

M.C.   I think that the media aspect of the story is essential, as the strictly war and geopolitical ones. Just as said the philosopher Baudrillard Jaen , in a postmodern society that is dominated by a "mediatic" reality, by communication's technologies increasingly pervasive and ambiguous, our situation, he argues, can be likened to a "ipereality." This is due to the total lack of distinction between objects and their representations, as it happens in the media world: the signs lose contact with the meaning of things, so that the end of the twentieth century was marked by her being a witness to the destruction of meanings unprecedented. For Baudrillard, the new electronic media presage a world of pure simulacra, models, code and digitality of artificial images that have become the "real", thus narrowing and eroding any distinction between the "real" world and that of ' mediated image. In essence, the narrative of a given political and institutional context - such as Syria today - always exceeds the actual reality of the facts. U.S. Imperialism has, in Syria today as in the past in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, the first major weapon in his service: the manipulation of information. Beyond the opinion of each individual on the Syrian political system, some aspects that are not reported by the Western media highlight: Bashar Al Assad is the legitimate President of the Syrian State, not because of some conspiracy or some strange formula, but simply because the majority of the Syrian people has freely elected in free elections, where, until proven otherwise, there is a representative parliamentary system with several parties that can contribute to power. I can not predict the evolution of the situation, I can only hope that Syria will be able to win his epic battle, and maintain its sovereignty and independence in the face of his assailants.

GRA:  How likely is a forceful U.S. intervention in the Syrian conflict and attempt to violently overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad (or the U.S. will keep a distance and will not dare to risk)? Under circumstances of such a possibility, what consequences it will bring to America itself?

M. C.   In fact, the Yankee attack has already begun, not even with a direct attack, but through indirect actions, international pressure, economic sanctions, infiltration of mercenaries and terrorists, huge loans to so-called rebels - ground proliferation of Islamic fundamentalism. There is a small detail, of which the United States must take into account: Syria is not alone to fight this epic battle. Yet another no recently expressed by Russia and China about a possible new actions of the Security Council of the United Nations on the Syrian crisis has sparked a real confrontation with the Western countries, also in favor of military solutions instead.

"The Russian position is well known, is balanced, and utterly devoid of emotions, which are ill-adapted to a situation so complicated. So, maybe it would not be correct to say that this position may change in the wake of pressure from anyone, "with these words Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for President Vladimir Putin has sought to stress the point of view of the Kremlin on the difficult situation in the country Arabic after repeated appeals to, more or less diplomatic, addressed by the EU and the U.S. in Moscow not to interfere with their plans for Damascus. Words which did not fail to replicate shortly after U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, always with the hypocrisy that characterizes it. "The Russians say they will not want to see a civil war, I tell them that their policy could trigger a civil war," he said from Copenhagen, where he is visiting, the former first lady.

Tags: 

An interview with Ali Reza Jalali

 

GRA : Western media confidently say that the fall of the current Syrian regime is inevitable. In your opinion, how well founded this prediction is, and is there some political power that can bring order to this situation?

Ali Reza Jalali : The current Syrian crisis represents the main geopolitical challenge in the Middle East, with important repercussions on stability of international relationships, both in the region and globally. We can say that this international challenge is the beginning of a new era and sign the transition from a so-called uni-polar world to a multi-polar global order.

As we have seen in recent months, relations between the countries members of the UNSC have cracked a lot, outlining a Western axis (USA, UK, France), who supports syrian opposition, as opposed to an Eurasian axis (Russia, China), who supprorts Bashar Assad and the stability of Damascus regime.

On the other hand, in the Middle East region, we can see two others axis: Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar (allies of the USA) against the "Axis of Resistance" (Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and some palestinians parties).

Qatar and Saudi Arabia seem to handle the media propaganda against the Syrian Government, while Turkey supports Syrian opposition (sympathizers of Al Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood [Syrian branch], liberals, terrorists from Arab countries, Afghanistan, Europe) with weapons and money.

In general, we can analyze the story from two points of view: in the media, the Syrian government would be coming to an end, even if it is more than a year since the Arab media and Western talk of an imminent fall of Assad. One of the leaders of the Syrian opposition (Burhan Ghalioun) spoke last summer (2011) about the end of the government in September, and now, a year later, Assad is still in power. This media propaganda is so strong globally, that world public opinion was influenced significantly. The ability to influence of the Western media has reached the peaks in Syrian crisis; in this, the support of the Arab media such as Al Jazeera and Al Arabya not be underestimated, since the absolute majority of the Arabs, be informed thanks to these channels. We can say openly that as regards the media war, the challenge is very difficult for Damascus government and Western dominance is clear. But from another point of view, the challenge is mainly on the ground.

Tags: 

An interview with Leonardo Olivetti

 

GRA : Western media confidently say that the fall of the current Syrian regime is inevitable. In your opinion, how well founded this prediction is, and is there some political power that can bring order to this situation?

L.O. : I do not think that Bashar al-Assad is near to the end. Bashar al-Assad's forces can count on a better equipment (tanks, fighter jets and artillery), more soldier than rebels' forces, and on the support of the majority of the syrian people. On the contrary, rebels can count almost exclusively on lightweight equipment (granades, gun, pistols, hand granades) and their tactics are based on guerriglia and terrorism. Actually, rebels control only some areas, near turkish and lebanese borders, military bases in the mountainous areas and a few parts of Aleppo (and I think Aleppo will be liberated soon by Assad's forces) and other small villages. In the long run, it's more probably (unless a foreign aggression) a victory for Bashar al-Assad's forces, who is the only Leader that can bring a new peace to Syria.

GRA : How likely is a forceful U.S. intervention in the Syrian conflict and attempt to violently overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad (or the U.S. will keep a distance and will not dare to risk)? Under circumstances of such a possibility, what consequences it will bring to America itself?

L.O.: During Syrian conflict, China and Russia used veto several times, and I think they won't change their approach on this topic. The only case of aggression is an action without the approval of the UN. Actually, Washington is trying to use the intrigue of "chemical arms", and this intrigue could be the 'casus belli' of the American aggression against Syria. This tactic is the last source for a foreign intervention, but, in my opinion, I do not think there will be a new "humanitarian" war in Syria. NATO have used much of their forces during the aggression in Libya, and not all NATO countries are ready to fight a war equally demanding (or probably more demanding). Moreover, the geopolitical and economical situation in Syria is completely different from past Libyan situation, and Russia, in the case of foreign aggression in Syria, will probably take a more clear position in favor of Bashar al-Assad. America will hurt by itself taking action in Syria, when it is not the only superpower capable of directing operations of this scale left.

Tags: 

An interview with Claudio Mutti

 
GRA: Western media confidently say that the fall of the current Syrian regime is inevitable. In your opinion, how well founded this prediction is, and is there some political power that can bring order to this situation?
C.M.: Western strategists and their Arab allies had announced that the Syrian regular army would be defeated before the end of Ramadan; but now it seems that they deluded themselves with false hopes, because the death squads of terrorists and mercenaries have registered thousands of dead, wounded and prisoners. Unlike the informations diffused by the embedded media, the armed gangs suffered a crushing defeat on the battlefields. Therefore I think that the Syrian Arab Republic will not collapse so easily as expected by U.S. and the others, notwithstanding its state of extreme weakness. At present, the Syrian government is the only political power which can face the disorder, if not bring order.
GRA: How likely is a forceful U.S. intervention in the Syrian conflict and attempt to violently overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad (or the U.S. will keep a distance and will not dare to risk)? Under circumstances of such a possibility, what consequences it will bring to America itself?
C. M.: The U. S. partecipation in the aggression against Syria is a matter of fact, because the mercenaries have been entrained by CIA in Turkey. Concerning a more direct intervention of U.S. against Syria, I think we must wait until November, when the presidential elections will be held. However, the U.S. strategy is clear: in its attempt to retard the decline of U.S. hegemony, Washington tries to divide Eurasia by all means; therefore U.S. want to subvert and balkanize Northern Africa, Middle East, Caucasus and Central Asia. Then Syria will not be let in peace. 

 

Интервью с португальским философом Дидиму Матусом

 
GRA: Западные СМИ уверенно утверждают, что падение нынешнего сирийского режима неизбежно. Как вы считаете, насколько основателен этот прогноз и существует ли некая политическая сила, которая способна навести порядок в этой ситуации?
D.M.: Падение не является неизбежным, западная пресса следует указаниям США, которые из-за невозможности проведения в данный момент прямой интервенции пытаются сформировать международное общественное мнение против сирийского режима. Массовые акции поддержки Асада со стороны России и Китая смогли бы изменить локальный сценарий, несмотря на всю инерционность журналистского сообщества.
GRA : Насколько вероятным является силовое вмешательство США в сирийский конфликт  и попытка насильственно свергнуть режим Башара Асада (или же США будeт сохранять дистанцию и не решатся на риск)? В условиях принятия такой возможности, какие последствия это принесёт самой Америке?
D.M.: Несомненно, что непосредственное вмешательство США сейчас затруднено благодаря противодействию России и Китая; рассматривая подобную перспективу, я не верю, что США захотят оказаться в состоянии прямого военного конфликта с этими двумя державами. Если они потеряют чувство меры и сделают что-то подобное, а Россия и Китай выполнят свои обещания, вступление США в конфликт может привести, по меньшей мере, к окончательному падению американского доминирования или к войне с применением ядерного оружия, III Мировой войне.
GRA : Как Вы оцениваете позицию России в этом вопросе? Способна ли она пойти на уступки, поддавшись на уловки Запада (например, на предложение Хилари Клинтон о создании демилитаризованной зоны) , не смотря на то, уже получила весьма тяжёлый опыт в ситуации с Ливией?
D.M. До сих пор Россия заявляла целостную позицию, единственно полезную для страны, и хотя сейчас происходит серия странных событий, вроде возможного открытия базы НАТО на территории России, надеюсь, Путин не поддастся на манипуляции из Вашингтона. При решении  данного вопроса всегда имеют значение экономические возможности США, и видимо американцы понимают, что экономика России возрождается.

Tags: 

Реза Саджази: Инструменты противодействия Западу

 

Посол Ирана в РФ уверен, что «горизонт событий в Сирии — обнадеживающий». Тегеран предлагает посреднические услуги в урегулировании сирийского кризиса

Иран пристально следит за развитием ситуации в Сирии, ведь от исхода сирийского конфликта напрямую зависит безопасность Исламской республики. В случае падения режима Башара Асада и прихода к власти в Сирии суннитских исламистов на западной границе Ирана замкнется санитарный кордон. Цепь враждебных Ирану государств, от Азербайджана до Кувейта, серьезно ограничит возможности его дипломатии на Ближнем Востоке, перечеркнет плоды десятилетней внешнеполитической работы и поставит под угрозу само существование Ирана.

Именно поэтому Тегеран активно выступает на стороне сирийских властей. На международной сцене возможности Ирана ограничены — спонсоры сирийской революции из числа монархий Залива и западных государств не пускают или выдавливают иранцев из всех международных институтов, участвующих в решении сирийской проблемы. Поэтому Иран сосредоточился на прямой помощи Дамаску. В ближайшее время сирийский министр по национальному примирению отправляется в Иран для консультаций. Согласно иранскому плану урегулирования, за стол переговоров должны сесть правительство Сирии и представители внутренней оппозиции, а к вооруженным повстанцам следует применить силовые формы воздействия. Об этом в эксклюзивном интервью «Эксперту Online» рассказал Чрезвычайный и Полномочный Посол Исламской Республики Иран Махмуд Реза Саджади.

— Господин посол, Иран в последнее время серьезно активизировался на сирийской линии. Какой у Тегерана план разрешения сирийского кризиса?

— Иран в сирийском кризисе действует в трех направлениях. Во-первых, через СМИ мы стараемся донести своевременную правдивую информацию о том, что происходит в Сирии. У нас есть телевизионные каналы на английском и арабском языках, также мы даем информацию на испанском, французском, немецком и урду.

То, что происходит в Сирии, отличается от того, что было в Йемене и в Египте. В Сирии нет народного недовольства, как было в тех двух странах. Причины кризиса здесь совсем другие. Если бы оппозиция в Сирии была сильной — как в Тунисе и Египте, — она смогла бы свергнуть правительство мирным путем. То, что происходит в Сирии, — это не оппозиция, это люди с оружием в руках, это вмешательство иностранных государств, которые направляют в Сирию оружие, деньги, боевиков, которые не дорожат жизнями людей.

Tags: 

"Tripolar world order"?

 

Adviser for geopolitical issues of Special Operations Command of U.S., head of the project "global governance" in Washington Foundation "New America", an influential political scientist Parag Khanna gives a new definition of the term "the second world." Noting the emergence of a kind of anti-ideological mentality, in the "second world" he includes countries that are midway between the "first world" and "third world". These countries have characteristics of both, their goal Parag Khanna defines as improvement of mutually beneficial relations with such strong political units as the European Union, the U.S. and China. In his opinion, these are "three empires", that are fighting for world domination. As for Russia, Khanna does not consider it a superpower, but certainly, considers it as one of the most powerful states. He puts Russia on a par with Japan and India. "Superpower - says Khanna - has a global reach, global influence and global ambitions. Superpower status means that it affects the decision-making at the same time around the world.” Khanna refers Russia to the "second world" countries. Following Brzezinski he sees our country as a prize, but not as the main player, and sharing the view of some Western political scientists, states that Russia will either submit or will be integrated. This opinion is shared by many experts on Sino-Russian relations. View of Russia from the West is not encouraging: for the next 50-60 years, political analysts predict China's dominance over Russia.

What is the role of the "second world" countries in the inevitably impending multipolar world? Parag Khanna believes that humanity is indeed moving towards multipolar model, and for the U.S. it means a fundamental loss of influence, because in this model United States are only one pole of power among other poles, which means that they will inevitably face the influence of such poles as Japan, India, Russia, China or Europe. In order to be factual political actors, none of these countries-poles need the approval of the United States. "The second world transformes into a self-contained anti-imperialist zone within which become stronger inter-regional relations. Russia has offered to build nuclear reactors in Iran and Libya, Kazakhstan and Malaysia hold conferences on the development of mutual trade relations, and between Iran, Indonesia and Venezuela forms the oil cartel. Chinese fly directly to Brazil, Brazilians - to Africa, Indians invest everywhere from Syria to Vietnam, and the investment fund of Abu Dhabi invests treasures of Emirate both in Wall Street, and Nanjing Road in Shanghai - symbol of the Chinese economic miracle."

 

An interview with Fabio Falchi

 

GRA: Western media confidently say that the fall of the current Syrian regime is inevitable. In your opinion, how well founded this prediction is, and is there some political power that can bring order to this situation?

F.F. : In every country there are ethnic, religious, ideological or social fractures, which can be exploited by foreign powers, in particular historical conditions. We know that in Syria there are armed gangs and terrorist groups, funded and supported mainly from Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United States. They can count on the presence in Syria of a strong core of Muslim Brothers, historical enemies of the regime Assad.  Furthermore, they are stronger and more determined by the fall of Gaddafi. So once again the media circus and embedded journalists play a decisive role in what might be termed the atlanticist strategy of disinformation. A strategy that cannot arouse wonder if you keep in mind all the lies that the U.S.  said in the last years to justify the so-called "humanitarian wars".But the syrian army, being a conscript army, can rely on the support of its people and the Assad regime has shown so far to be able to defeat the rebels. In this situation, only Russia (with China and Iran) could play a positive role in this geopolitical area,  stopping "bullying policy" of the West.

GRA: How likely is a forceful U.S. intervention in the Syrian conflict and attempt to violently overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad (or the U.S. will keep a distance and will not dare to risk)? Under circumstances of such a possibility, what consequences it will bring to America itself?

F.F. : The U.S. would risk much to engage directly in this conflict. But the U.S. is increasingly dependent on some of their allies. And we should also take note that the United States, Britain and France have said they will try solutions outside the UN. Meaning that they are willing to do anything to defend an international system that is functional only to the interests of  "markets" even willing to start a war between Sunnis and Shiites, so as to strengthen the criminal regimes of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. And now we must also bear in mind that the israeli government  is  pointing the finger at Hezbollah and Iran.  And we know that Syria is the link between Hezbolllah and Iran.

GRA: How do you assess Russia's position in this issue? Is Russia able to compromise, yielding to the wiles of the West (for example, the proposal of Hillary Clinton to establish demilitarized zone), despite the fact, that Russia has already received a very difficult experience in the situation in Libya?

F.F. : Russia (along with China, Iran and Hezbollah) can inflict a decisive defeat to to the zionist and atlanticist arrogance, thanks to the determination and strength of Syria.

An interview with Tim Kirby

 

GRA: Western media confidently say that the fall of the current Syrian regime is inevitable. In your opinion, how well founded this prediction is, and is there some political power that can bring order to this situation?

F.F. : In every country there are ethnic, religious, ideological or social fractures, which can be exploited by foreign powers, in particular historical conditions. We know that in Syria there are armed gangs and terrorist groups, funded and supported mainly from Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United States. They can count on the presence in Syria of a strong core of Muslim Brothers, historical enemies of the regime Assad.  Furthermore, they are stronger and more determined by the fall of Gaddafi. So once again the media circus and embedded journalists play a decisive role in what might be termed the atlanticist strategy of disinformation. A strategy that cannot arouse wonder if you keep in mind all the lies that the U.S.  said in the last years to justify the so-called "humanitarian wars".But the syrian army, being a conscript army, can rely on the support of its people and the Assad regime has shown so far to be able to defeat the rebels. In this situation, only Russia (with China and Iran) could play a positive role in this geopolitical area,  stopping "bullying policy" of the West.

GRA: How likely is a forceful U.S. intervention in the Syrian conflict and attempt to violently overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad (or the U.S. will keep a distance and will not dare to risk)? Under circumstances of such a possibility, what consequences it will bring to America itself?

F.F. : The U.S. would risk much to engage directly in this conflict. But the U.S. is increasingly dependent on some of their allies. And we should also take note that the United States, Britain and France have said they will try solutions outside the UN. Meaning that they are willing to do anything to defend an international system that is functional only to the interests of  "markets" even willing to start a war between Sunnis and Shiites, so as to strengthen the criminal regimes of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. And now we must also bear in mind that the israeli government  is  pointing the finger at Hezbollah and Iran.  And we know that Syria is the link between Hezbolllah and Iran.

GRA: How do you assess Russia's position in this issue? Is Russia able to compromise, yielding to the wiles of the West (for example, the proposal of Hillary Clinton to establish demilitarized zone), despite the fact, that Russia has already received a very difficult experience in the situation in Libya?

F.F. : Russia (along with China, Iran and Hezbollah) can inflict a decisive defeat to to the zionist and atlanticist arrogance, thanks to the determination and strength of Syria.

Pages