GRANews-Episode 2 Gaddafi's end

The tragic end of Muhammar Gaddafi

(special issue of GRAnews channel)

Global Revolutionary Alliance News with Natella Speranskaya (Russia) as a host "Global revolutionary approach to the Lybia occupation"  

Dissonance with Alexandre Latsa (France) "Sarkozy and his atlanticism" 

Arise! with Antonio Grego (Italy) "Berlusconi's  betrayal"

Stratagems with Leo Savin (Russia) "Arab spring as the result of the network centric war"

Dissent with Mark Sleboda (USA) "Right To Protect doctrine is criminal one"

 

Topics: 

GRANews-Episode 3. Syria - Armageddon

Episode 3. Syria - Armageddon

The Problem of Dajjal.

Natella Speranskaya: Syria - the last call and final mobilization.

Leo Savin (Stratagems): the oil factor in geopolitics of Syrian conflict.

Bernard-Henri Levy - not dead (yet).

The geopolitics and the eschatology. The symbolism of Damascus.

Tim Kirby (Offensive): the double standards of USA.

Putin's Russia stands firmly

Mark Sleboda (Dissent): the Syria in new IR world structure.

Topics: 

Video: Laurent James about Jean Parvulesco and eurasianism (French). Parts 1-3

French traditionalist writer Laurent James speaks about Jean Parvulesco and eurasianism in French during the traditionalist conference Against Post-Modern World Moscow/Zvenigirod in october 2011.

The eurasianism as the overcoming of neolithic revolution.

Jean Parvulesco and Antonin Artaud.

Eurasianism and George Bataille.

Arthur Rimbaud and angel of humanity.

The multipolar world. An interview with Giacomo Guarini

 
 I would talk about a multipolar system rather than a bipolar one. It is clear that there are more than only one country which are emerging in the world and looking for a more fair division of power, based on multiple centres of macro-regional influence, in juxtaposition with the unipolar configuration. We can make different examples of regional and international organizations (and, above all, we can mention the BRICS group) as tangible signs of general tendency towards a new multipolar system. Assuming all that, I would say that we should not focus on the hypothesis of a single power able to challenge the global hegemon but on a whole system of emerging powers, which has to demonstrate its will to put aside both the possible rivalries existing inside the block and the strategies based on short-sided nationalistic perspectives. The role of both China and Russia in this process is fundamental, both because of their political, economic and strategic potential and because of their position which makes them the most important obstacles to the run of the US aimed at the penetration and at the control of the Eurasian landmass.
 

Натэлла Сперанская: Четвёртая Политическая Теория и «другая Европа»

Хайнрих Майер в книге «Карл Шмитт, Лео Штраус и Понятие политического» пишет, что миру, который пытается уклониться от различения друга и врага, Шмитт наглядно показывает неизбежность радикального Или-или, чтобы обострить «сознание чрезвычайной ситуации» и снова пробудить способность, проявляющуюся в те мгновения, «когда враг с конкретной ясностью обнаруживается как враг". Несомненно, что сегодня мы безошибочно можем назвать нашего врага по имени. Этот идеологический (и онтологический) враг – либерал, приверженец политической теории, которая одержала победу над двумя идеологиями двадцатого столетия – коммунизмом и фашизмом (национал-социализмом). С последствиями этой победы мы имеем дело сегодня. Говоря «мы», я имею в виду не какое-либо абстрактное политическое образование, но представителей евразийской геополитической традиции, или линии теллурократической геополитики (соответственно, враги определяются через причастность к талассократической геополитике). Лео Штраус, комментируя фундаментальный труд «Понятие политического», отмечает, что при всей содержащейся в нём радикальной критике либерализма, Шмитт не доводит её до конца, поскольку предпринятая им критика «разворачивается и остаётся в горизонте либерализма».

 

 

Jure Vujić's book War of the Worlds – Euroasianism versus Atlantism

To date, Jure Vujić has published the books Fragmenti geopolitičke misli (2004) and Intelektualni terorizam (2007) in Croatian and the book “ LA MODERNITÉ À L'ÉPREUVE DE L'IMAGE L'obsession visuelle de l'occident in French. This is the fourth book of the prominent Croatian political scientist and geopolitical expert.
In 1919, Sir Halford John Mackinder published the book on Democratic Ideals and Reality: A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction presenting the thesis statement about the heartland: the power that managed to control Eastern Europe would also dominate Euroasia, and whoever dominated Euroasia should rule the world.
The book 'War of the Worlds – Euroasianism versus Atlantism' is a true and the first synthesis in the Croatian language that elaborates on the idea of Euroasia or the heartland as the key geostrategic area in which opposed geopolitical and economic interests come to play. The author approached the subject as a topical metapolitical, philosophical and cultural conceptual matrix that represents a real alternative to Atlantism. The rivalry relation between Atlantism and Euroasianism is symbolically represented by the illustration of Behemoth, the mythical monster of the land, and sea monster Leviathan.

The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Croatia, His Excellency Robert Markaryan, conveyed to the audience the thought of Vladimir Putin that 'whoever has no feeling for the disintegration of the Soviet Union has no heart, and whoever believes it will come together again has no brain.' He also mentioned that Vujić's book was pioneer work in this area and a great scientific contribution to the development of Russian-Croatian relations.Vujić's new book War of the Worlds – Euroasianism versus Atlantism ( Zagreb, Croatia )

War of the Worlds

Jure Vujić's new book War of the Worlds – Euroasianism versus Atlantism ( Zagreb, Croatia )
On Thursday, December 20, 2012, the promotion of Jure Vujić's book War of the Worlds – Euroasianism versus Atlantism (with a foreword by Dr. Robert Steuckers) took place at the Cultural Information Centre in Zagreb. With the author the event was also attended by historian Toni Abramović and H.E. DSc Robert Markaryan, the Ambassador of the Russian Federation. The moderator was Petar Bujas.
To date, Jure Vujić has published the books Fragmenti geopolitičke misli (2004) and Intelektualni terorizam (2007) in Croatian and the book “ LA MODERNITÉ À L'ÉPREUVE DE L'IMAGE L'obsession visuelle de l'occident in French. This is the fourth book of the prominent Croatian political scientist and geopolitical expert.

Натэлла Сперанская. Евразия и Европа: диалог «больших пространств»

Карл Шмитт рассматривал землю как единое целое и занимался поиском её глобального предназначения. Это «целое» было оформлено Шмиттом в виде концепции Номоса. Он использовал греческое слово, происходящее от глагола «nemein», которое тождественно немецкому «nehmen» — «брать». Номос заключал в себе три акта первородной драмы: «взятие», «деление и распределение взятого», «эксплуатацию и использование взятого и распределённого». Согласно Шмитту, Номос земли был всегда. Первый Номос описывается им как «земля обетованная» древних народов. Это Номос древности и Средневековья. Он перестал существовать после открытия великих океанов и американского континента. Так было положено начало второму Номосу, номосу национальных суверенных государств, имевшему евроцентричную структуру. События первой мировой войны привели к его разрушению, вследствие чего земля распалась на восточную и западную части, которые находились в состоянии «холодной» войны. Речь идёт не о простой географической противоположности, а о более изначальном и глубоком протиповоставлении. 

Natella Speranskaya . Eurasia and Europe: Dialogue of “Big Spaces”

Carl Schmitt regarded the earth as a single whole and was looking for its global mission. This "whole" was formed by Schmitt in the concept of Nomos. He used the Greek word derived from the verb «nemein», which is identical to German “nehmen” - “to take”. Nomos comprises three acts of the drama: "taking", "division and distribution of the taken", "exploitation and use of the taken and distributed." According to Schmitt, Nomos of the Earth existed always. First Nomos is described as a "promised land" of ancient peoples. It is the Nomos of the ancient times and the Middle Ages. It ceased to exist after the exploration of the great oceans and the American continent. Thus began the Second Nomos, the Nomos of national sovereign states that had the Eurocentric structure. Events of the World War II led to its destruction, so that the land was divided into east and west, which were in a state of "cold war". It is not about mere geographic opposites, but a more original and profound contradistinctions. 

Putin's Russia stands firmly

 

From the very beginning, of the Syrian conflict, Moscow has taken an unequivocal position: it is Syria's sovereign and internal affair and no external intervention is tolerable or legal under international law.

Russia has not only discouraged the possibility of intervention but univocally has spoken against it at the UN Security Council .

China has held to the same position.

Two geopolitical camps have formed around the Syrian conflict: In the one camp are those against any intervention and the supporters of a multipolar world : Russia, China, and Iran

And in the other camp—  sectarian and extremist forces and opponents of the secular Syrian state, supported by the United States, Israel, and their allies in the Islamic world - Turkey, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia.

Putin firmly warned Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan that he will not tolerate the intervention of Turkish troops in Syria. This would entail NATO intervention under Article 5 as Turkey is a NATO member.

Kirby: hypocrisy of NATO

The pretext for all of NATO's actions throughout the world is democracy, freedom or some other cute buzzword. Going around the world shoving your culture’s ideology down everyone else’s throat on a liberal crusade is bad enough but fighting this crusade in an openly hypocritical way is another thing entirely.

Syria has become the trendy “humanitarian crisis” of 2012. This is a story we’ve heard many times before; Iraq, Libya, Serbia. Some group of people somewhere is under the yolk of brutal tyranny so they need to be saved by being murdered by NATO bombs.

But let’s play a bit of a game. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that all the allegations of NATO are true and because Assad is a “bad guy” the West has the right to invade or fight him via proxy forces killing the population until they are free.

Then why is Syria so alone in the crosshairs when many of its neighbors are far from shining examples of democracy?

Luckily I recently had to do a bit of research on the lovely Island of Bahrain where they round people up for “Tweeting” about the King yes, arrests for what you say on stupid Twitter. The King, a MONARCH, has recently banned protests and demonstrations of any sort and arrested opposition leaders, if this happened in certain countries there would be media outrage but since Bahrain bribes CNN everything gets smoothed over. Since 2011 they also have a curfew as in you can’t go out of your house at night if they don’t want you to.

Bernard-Henri Levy: criminal philosopher

The Arab Spring began in Tunisia and then spread to Egypt.

Prior to this, they were ruled by dictators quite subservient to the West, but this was still not enough for the Hegemony,

They still clung to tattered fragments of national sovereignty and stability.

The West has chosen to open Pandora's box.

It has made a bid for its old ally - Wahhabi fundamentalism.

These forces have always helped the U.S. to achieve their core interests in the Islamic world – undermining and routing all the tendencies that might be hostile to the U.S.

This was the case in Afghanistan in the 1980’s, when the American geopolitician and ideologue Zbigniew Brzezinski personally tutored Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

Pro-American regimes in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the nest of Wahhabist terrorism are now playing the role of regional sub-imperialist proxies. The Wahhabis did the dirty work for the US in Tunisia and Egypt. And the most loathsome service was done in Libya with Qaddafi horrifically murdered.

Wahhabi mercenaries under the protection of the direct intervention of NATO have overthrown the Libyan government and the heroic anti-imperialist colonel was taken from us all.

But it is true, immanent justice exists.

One moment we are seeing Qaddafi tortured and killed.

Pages