Part 2. The image of a normal world

 Part 2. The image of a normal world

  1. We are told (it is hypnosis and propaganda), that “it can not be” other way (than it is now). Or that any alternative would be "even worse”. This familiar tune that “democracy has many flaws, but all other political regimes are so much worse, that it is better to tolerate with what already is”. This is falsehood and political propaganda. The world we live in, is unacceptable, intolerable, leading to inevitable death, and finding an alternative to it is a condition of survival. If we don’t overthrow the status quo, don’t change the course of development of civilization, don’t deprive from power and destroy the global oligarchy as a system and as  specific forces, groups, institutions, corporations and even individuals, we’ll become not only victims but also complicit of the impending end. The claim that "everything is not so bad", that "before it was worse," that "somehow everything will get better" etc. is a deliberate form of suggestion, hypnosis, intended to lull remains of free consciousness, independent and sober analysis. Global oligarchy can not allow lieges of the global elite to dare to think independently and all alone, without reference to their secretly and surreptitiously imposed standards. This elite does not act directly, as in totalitarian regimes of the past, but subtly, insidiously, producing their dogmas for granted, and even as a free choice of each person. But human dignity consists in the ability to choose and to choose specifically between saying “yes” or “no” to the current situation. Nothing and never under any circumstances can not automatically cause a humane "yes". "No" can be said to everything, anytime and under any circumstances. Denying this right, the global elite denies us to have human dignity. That means, it opposes not only humanity, but humaneness, human nature. And this alone gives us the right to revolt against it, to radically say “no” to it and the whole state of affairs, to refute its suggestion, to wake up from its hypnosis, to approve another world, another way, a different order, different system, different present and future. The world that surrounds us, is unacceptable. It is bad from all points of view. It is unjust, disastrous, untrustworthy, lying, it is not free. It must be crushed and destroyed. We need a different world. And it will not be worse, as the global oligarchy and its loyal servants frighten us, but it will be better and salvatory.
  2. What is in this case, the correct world, the desired world order? What is the standard platform from which we estimate the existing as a pathology? The image of the normal world of different forces, pari passu discordant with the current situation may be very different. And if you delve into the details of alternatives projects, controversies will inevitably arise in the camp of the supporters of global alternatives, their unity will be shaken, their will to resist will be paralyzed, competition of projects will undermine consolidation of forces, which is necessary to resist. Thus, a normal world, a better world, must be talked of with the utmost caution. Nevertheless, there are some absolutely obvious principles and benchmarks, which can hardly be questioned by anyone in the right mind. Let's try to find them.
  1. An economic model is required, an alternative  to existing today system of speculative financial capitalism. Alternative can be seen as in real industrial capitalism, in Islamic economy, in socialism,  so in environmental projects, as linked to the real production sector, so in search of completely new economic mechanisms, including new forms of energy, labor organization etc. Normal economy will not be that one, which exists today.
  2. In resource-poor the distribution problem must be solved on the basis of common to all mankind plan, not on the basis of egoistic struggle for controlling it. Resource wars - military or just economic - must be drastically suppressed. Humanity is threatened with death, and in the face of this fact, we have to move to a different attitude to the democratic and resource issue. In this game there can not be winners. Everyone will lose. In a normal world, this threat should be answered by all the people of the world together, not individually.
  3. Normal and the best state of human existence is not fragmentation and dissipation into atomic individuals, but preservation of social collective structures, maintaining transmission of culture, knowledge, languages, practices, beliefs. Man is a social being, that’s why liberal individualism is destructive and criminal. We must save the human society at any cost. From this follows that the social orientation must prevail over the liberal-individualistic one.
  4. In a society which was to take place, one should maintain his species dignity, his identity, his essence, his wholeness, as well as the structures, without which his personality can not develop and fix - family, work, public institutions, the right of one to participate in his own fate, etc. Trends leading to the dispersal of people and to its replacement by other universal human types, should be stopped and turned away. Man is something that should be retained, and even recreated.
  5. The normal society is that one, where peoples, nations and states are stored as traditional forms of human community, as created forms, created by history and tradition. They can change or transform, but they should not be abolished or forcibly merged into a single  global melting pot. Diversity of peoples and nations is a historical treasure of mankind. Abolishing it we will come to the abolition of history, to the end of plural marriage, freedom and cultural wealth. Globalization processes must be immediately cut down.
  6. Normal society is based on the possibility of getting knowledge, of knowledge transfer, on open ability to osmose the world, the existence, the human being on the basis of tradition, experience, discoveries and free search. The sphere of knowledge should not be a field of virtual pageant, of mass media hypnosis or a space for manipulation of consciousness on a global scale. Mass media surrogates and virtual strategies that substitute reality must be reassigned to sober self-reflection based on open source, intuition, creativity and experience. To achieve this, it is necessary to crush the current dictatorship of the media, to break the monopoly of global elites to control the mass consciousness.
  7. Normal society should have a positive horizon of the future in front of itself. But at the same time to achieve the intended purpose, it is necessary to abandon the delusion that things in themselves are developing well or, on the contrary, the assumption that the catastrophe is inevitable. The point of human history is that it is open, it includes a component of human will and the ability of one to implement his  freedom. This makes the future zone of possibilities: it won’t be  itself neither better nor worse, as it can be created by the people as such, and other. All depends on what we choose and what we do. If we reject the choice and strong-willed construction, the future may not come at all. Or it would not be humane.

Normal society must be diverse and plural, polycentric. It must contain many open possibilities, many cultures. Normal is free, not forced dialogue. Each society may choose itself the balance between spiritual and material components. Yet as history shows, the sharp domination of materialism invariably leads to disaster. Forgetting about the spiritual dimension of one is fatal and is baneful to him. The current sharp lurch to the exaggerated materialism must be offset by a sharp turn to the spiritual principle. And absolutely unacceptable is the total domination of money over all other values. Values can be of any type, but in any normal society they should not be placed on a highest level. In this sense, every society where the role of money is not as great as in ours, by definition, is more normal, fair and acceptable than that one, in which we live today. Who thinks otherwise is either sick, or is an agent of influence of the global oligarchy. Justice and harmony are more important than personal success and greed. Greed and desire for individual well-being are considered a sin by most of human cultures, or at least a weakness. And the justice, concern for the common good, is one of the most common values. A just society is more normal than that one, which is based on selfishness. A normal world order is that one, which recognizes the balance of power, the right of different societies and cultures for their own way. Videlicet this is the norm. And this norm, even in most general and approximate form, radically contrasts with that, what we have around us. Status quo is not normal, this is pathology. Once the global oligarchy’s hypnosis is crushed, all things return to focus.
3. In a normal society, we can not do without power in general. In one or another form it was, is and will be. It is also present in a global society that exists today. This power belongs to a global oligarchy that only veils it under the guise of "democracy" and "complicity", "dispersion of decision-making centres".
Global oligarchy remains the power in its every sense, but becomes not direct, but indirect, acts not by direct coercion, but with subtle control. It is less coarse than other forms of power, but is more insidious, deceitful and sneaky, and not less brutal and totalitarian. Occasionally it takes the form of a paradoxical totalitarian anarchism, giving full freedom to the masses, but only while maintaining complete control over the content of this freedom and its parameters. You can do everything, but only in accordance with established rules. The rule are dictated by the global oligarchy. In a normal society, the power should belong not to anonymous political and financial elite, that steadily leads humanity to its death, but to the best ones - the strongest, smartest, most spiritual and fair, the heroes and sages, but not to the network of global corrupt officials, the liars and usurpers. Power always involves projection of multiple wills to a single instance. Formation of this instance should proceed in accordance with the historical, social, cultural, and sometimes the religious traditions of each particular society. There is no general formula of optimal power. Democracy works in one society and is a fiasco in another. The monarchy occurs ti be harmonious, and may  reborn into tyranny. Collective management provides both positive and negative results. There are no universal recipes, suitable for all. But any power (and even lack of it) is better than that one, which exists today and which seized the control over global humanity.
4. The standard comes from a particular history of a particular human society. And it should not be other. The norm, the sample, the ideal, the law societies and peoples acquire through many sufferings, trials, errors, assessments, experiments, they hatch this rule for centuries. And that’s why each particular society has the inalienable right for its own norm. For its own values. No one from aside has the right to criticize this norm on the basis of his own historical society, distinct from other ones. If peoples and nations do not develop the same way, as  their neighbours do, it means not that they simply can not do so, but that they in extenso don’t want to, that they estimate historical time and the scale of successes and failures according to other criteria. And this should be avowed once and for all, and any colonial and racist prejudices should be categorically refused: if some society is not similar to ours, is doesn’t mean that it is worse, more backward or primitive; it's just different, and its otherness - is its nature, that we must avow. Only such an approach is normal. Globalism, west-centrism and universalism are profound pathology requiring eradication. Especially, it is pathological or even criminal, if universal standards are defined by illegitimate, self-proclaimed global elite, that had usurped the planetary power. There are as many norms, as many societies there are, videlicet this norm is universal one, the absence of uniform standard for all, freedom and right of choice.