The Greater Europe Project

Submitted by admin on Sun, 12/25/2011 - 12:42

The only feasible alternative in present circumstances is to found in the context of a multi-polar world. Multi-polarity can grant to any country and civilisation on the planet the right and the freedom to develop its own potential, to organise its own internal reality in accordance with the specific identity of its culture and people, to propose a reliable basis of just and balanced international relations amongst the world’s nations. Multi-polarity should be based on the principle of equity among the different kinds of political, social and economic organisations of these nations and states. Technological progress and a growing openness of countries should promote dialogue amongst, and the prosperity of, all peoples and nations. But at the same time it shouldn’t endanger their respective identities. Differences between civilisations do not have to necessarily culminate in an inevitable clash between them – in contrast to the simplistic logic of some American writers. Dialogue, or rather ‘polylogue’, is a realistic and feasible possibility that we should all exploit in this regard.

Natella Speranskaya Gaddafi as tragic Third Position hero

Submitted by admin on Fri, 12/09/2011 - 21:25

 

The Major role in whole story was played, of course, by the United States. Today, no one in the world has any doubt that we have to deal with the Empire, with the imperialism and the colonialism in the worst sense of the words.

The Americans themselves after 2000 have began to apply the term Empire to US. They are non shy any more.

Do we have to deal with American Empire.

The neocons are particularly frank and rather cynical. They don’t hesitate to proclaim openly the Project of New American Century.

The humanitarian demagogy is over. We are living in the conditions of the new  hegemony.

They persuade us to accept it as a matter of fact. For decency's sake they prefer to  call it "benevolent  hegemony” . Yeah wow really “benevolent” ...

Every day, thousands of innocent people, mostly  civilians, children, women, old people are dying merciless killed by this benevolent hegemony. And it become every day more and more hard.

Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya,  today. Propably Syria will be tomorrow, next in line is Iran, then everywhere. Benevolent hegemony...

The global oligarchy has put its masks aside.

 

Leonid Savin Network centric strategies in the Arab spring

Submitted by admin on Fri, 12/09/2011 - 21:15

Military and science specialists in the U.S. have permanently adapted their forces and departments to the new conditions. Starting from aggression in Vietnam and ending with subversive activities in Latin America, Washington investigated tactical and strategic mistakes and made corresponding conclusions. But it became possible to speak of transition to the new form of conflict only after the war in Persian Gulf in 1991, when the U.S. with the help of telecommunication technologies have shown to whole world its military capabilities. Herewith the strikes were made not only to military infrastructure of Iraq, but to critical sites – communication system and energy resources, civilian objects, and in parallel the propaganda campaign was held. The model, proposed by colonel John Warden, named “the war from inside to outside” and the theory of five strategic rings, proceeded theoretical and practical justification in the following conflicts, particularly, in Yugoslavia. Thus, due to efforts of admiral Owens, Johnson and vice-admiral Sibrovski, appeared the concept of net-centric warfare, that reflected those changes, that occurred in commercial and information environment of the U.S. Having logically assumed, that these changes will necessarily affect the military sphere, the Pentagon itself began to intensively adapt information systems, armaments, and the most important, intellectual personnel of new generation warfare. Parallel to this, workers of the RAND corp. 

Tags: 
Stratagems

Antonio Grego. Gaddafi and Italy, the Treaty on Friendship

Submitted by admin on Fri, 12/09/2011 - 21:10

Berlusconi has made the same mistake in the eyes of the elites that control Italy, trying to create a partially independent foreign policy especially towards Russia and Libya. The climax of these relations with Libya, in addition to economic agreements, is marked by the signature of the treaty of friendship and cooperation between Italy and Libya taken place in Benghazi in 2008. This treaty provided, in addition to the settlement of the dispute about the colonial past of Italy, also favorable conditions for investments by Italian companies in Libya and the explicit renunciation of any use of force or interference in the internal affairs of both states. The treaty and other agreements were bringing huge economic benefits to the Italian economy and were a great opportunity for Italian companies in crisis, from this point of view, therefore, the war against Libya is a war against Italy too because it directly affects its economic interests and its security.

Alexander Latsa. French war on Libya

Submitted by admin on Fri, 12/09/2011 - 21:08

So the job is finally done, Libya is now a free country.  The tyrant who oppressed his people, who were seeking democracy and freedom, has been neutralized. The Libyans are now free and will soon have the right to choose between Coca-cola and Pepsi, Mercedes and Audi, or between McDonalds and Burger King. Basically, what they were looking for like any other people on the planet. At least this is the same story we have been told a decade ago during the war on Afghanistan. As in 1999 in Serbia, in 2001 in Afghanistan or in 2004 in Iraq, the Western military intervention was in defiance of all rules of law, justice and morality. The western crusade was once again non-religious but clearly ideological and geopolitical and its goal is clear: the destruction of all the states which are either non-aligned or do not meet western standards, especially those found guilty of maintaining close relations with the main competitors of the western domination, that is to say mostly of course China and Russia.

Mark Sleboda ‘MONSTERS TO DESTROY’

Submitted by admin on Fri, 12/09/2011 - 21:06

Personally, I blame Russian President Dmitri Medvedev for the fall of Libya and I believe he shares responsibility for all the deaths that have followed, as he broke with the longstanding Russian foreign policy tradition of upholding the UN Charter’s foundation of the inviolability of state sovereignty and abstained in an attempt to curry favor with Western powers for his domestic ‘modernization’ agenda, or as it should more correctly be called – neoliberalism. With this turnaround, Medvedev’s administration faced disagreement and opposition from Prime Minister Putin, from within the Foreign Ministry and even from Russia’s ambassador to Libya who reportedly wrote Medvedev a letter calling him ‘a traitor to the motherland’ for his selling out of Libya, before being recalled. At the point the resolution was passed, the insurrection had been quickly rolled back and contained by the Libyan Army to the Eastern city of Benghazi. Libya’s government needed one or two weeks at most to put down the rebellion and to restore law and order to the country.  A Russian veto would have stopped cold or at least stalled with political indecision NATO’s military plans. Given that time, all the deaths and destruction of Libya’s infrastructure and society could have been avoided and Quaddafi and his sons would still be alive with us today.

Tags: 
sleboda

Mark Sleboda The Tradition and the ecology

Submitted by admin on Fri, 11/25/2011 - 23:33

The speech by Mark Sleboda on the Tradition and ecology in the course of the Moscow conference "Against Post-Modern World". The fisrt approach to the synthesis of the traditionalism and the Green Theory. The ecocentric approach to the World politics and the philosophy of life. The necessisty of the Deep Green Religion as the an alternative to the capitalist unhuman exploitation of the nature and the people of the planet. The union of the spiritual tradition of the past and the avanguard ecologic attitude to the living planet.

Latsa Battle for Eurasia (II)

Submitted by admin on Fri, 11/25/2011 - 22:01

So, after the Second World War Europe was divided into two with an Iron Curtain, the USSR was consider the major bidder for Eurasian dominion and at the same time «Promethean» movement, desperately wishing to split the Union into separate pieces, was actively supported by the CIA. American strategists were going to try out the geopolitical skills of their ideologists for real, attempting to girdle Russia with a network of buffer countries, allowing the USA to promote their own Eurasian policy. They’ve used an utmost innovative approach: they’ve organized the delusively spontaneous wave of people’s riots against existing regimes in the neighboring countries, but without usage of violent fights and via the well-arranged network of underground organizations. In order to do so, they’ve created a variety of associations and NGOs. They’ve dubbed themselves champions of democratic principles but mostly they’ve been only protecting American political interests in the countries that it recognized as unreliable and non-democratic. I.e. these are the countries that do not enter Western alliances and belong to the union of non-allied states. That strategic concept is not new; it is dated by the 80s, the height of the Cold War. Strategy developed into tremendous number of NGOs, funded by Reagan government in order to weaken Soviet influence and oppose it.